The Impact of Leadership Development: A Lockheed Martin case study
- URL: https://linkageincec.webex.com/linkageincec/onstage/g.php?t=a&d=667727740
- Date: 2010-11-18 13:00:00 EST
- Listed: November 8, 2010 2:35 pm
- Expires: This ad has expired
Description
Lockheed Martin evaluated the effectiveness of their leadership development model and their system for selecting and developing high potential leaders using Linkage’s Return on Leadership Development (ROLD) assessment. The project, which led to some surprising results, used several business impact measures, included leaders at all levels of the organization and involved a “live†Lockheed Martin action learning team.
Join us for an overview and discussion of Lockheed Martin’s ROLD work, including their successes and challenges in measuring their LD strategies.
In this session, we will address:
Why your organization should measure leadership development and who should be involved?
What does it take to get real results? What is the commitment? What are the benefits and challenges?
What can you do once you have the results? What impact can you achieve?
About the presenters:
Marilyn Figlar, is the Vice President of Leadership and Organizational Development, Lockheed Martin Corporation. She oversees all learning, talent and leadership development strategies and programs.
Jill Maver Ihsanullah, Ph.D. is the Chief Architect of Linkage’s Return on Leadership Development (ROLD) practice. An industrial/organizational psychologist with over twenty years of consulting experience, Jill is an expert in assessment and measurement.
No related posts.
2 Responses to “The Impact of Leadership Development: A Lockheed Martin case study”
Trackbacks/Pingbacks
Leave a Reply
Other items listed by Linkage
- Ordinary Greatness: The Simple Way to Recognize Your Team’s Talent
- Get Better Results Today: Creating a Culture of Collaboration
- Why Y?: Plugging into a Generational Powerhouse
- Taking Control of Change
- From Discounting Disabilities to Accepting Differences
Despite some claims to the contrary, return-on-investment research that directly links leadership development implementations to financial return is rare. This is because it is very difficult to document accurately.